Ø Preamble
to the National Environmental Policy Act (1969)
An environmental impact analysis
is typically conducted to assess the potential impact a proposed development
project will have on the natural and social environment. This may include an
assessment of both the short- and long-term effects on the physical
environment, such as air, water and/or noise pollution; as well as effects on
local services, living and health standards, and aesthetics. In enacting the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, Congress required all agencies of the
Federal government to give equal consideration to environmental consequences as
well as to economic motivations and technological feasibility when making a
decision that could affect the quality of the human and natural environment.
Ø One provision
of the law requires that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be written for
major federal actions and made available to all, including to the general
public. An EIS must include: the environmental impacts of a proposed action;
unavoidable adverse environmental impacts; alternatives—including no action;
the relationship between short-term uses of the environment and maintenance of
long-term ecological productivity; irreversible and irretrievable commitments
of resources; and secondary/cumulative effects of implementing the proposed
action. Now, most state and local governments also require that environmental
impact analyses be conducted prior to any major development projects.
stages of the EIA
Identifying Alternatives
Part II of Schedule 4 of the
regulations requires the applicant to provide a reasoned decision of the main
alternatives to development. These requirements raise a number of important new
issues about planning decision making. It suggests for example that a developer
would honestly seek to examine other development sites which may not be in
their control. It also suggests that in the case of waste disposal,
consideration should be given to more sustainable solutions in sectors outside
the operational range of the company. In practice therefore the assessment of
alternatives is at present fairly meaningless since developers will not
identify an option likely to make profits for a competitor.
Scoping
Scoping is simply the part of the
process when the applicant and the LPA decided what issues the EIA will
investigate. The emphasis should be on the 'main' or 'significant' effects.
Other issues may be of little or no significance for the particular development
and will need only brief treatment to indicate that their relevance has been
considered. Regulation 10 of the Regulations allows developers to obtain a
formal scoping opinion from an LPA on what should be included in an ES. This is
a controversial move because it throws a considerable administrative burden on
planning officers. It also means that responsibility for failing to include an
important issue rests as much with planning officers as it does with the
applicant.
Baseline
The scoping exercise enables the
applicant to establish the existing conditions or standards referred to as the
baseline against which the effects of the proposed development may be judged.
This can be crucial stage for communities who may have local knowledge which is
highly relevant to understanding the base line conditions.
Consultation
As well as consulting the local
authority anyone conducting an EIA is obliged to consult a set of statutory
consultees. These names which included government agencies and laid down in
regulation and are obliged to provide information which they held and which
might be
EIA: a campaigner's guide
relevant to the EIA. In practice
there are some key consultees such as the Environment Agency who deal with a
whole range of pollution issues and flood defence and English Nature and English
Heritage who deal with biodiversity and archaeology respectively.
The consultation bodies are only
required to provide information already in their possession usually held on
public registers. They are not required to carry out any research on behalf of
the applicant. A reasonable charge may be made to cover the cost of making the
information available to the applicant.
In addition to the statutory
consultation many of those working with third parties have taken the directive
requirement for consultation as applying to the whole community placing a
burden on the developers negotiating with local communities. In reality while
this may be best practice UK EIA regulations do not require any additional
level of public consultation. The applicant may however choose to consult other
local organisations with a specific interest particularly where local groups or
societies may have prepared species schedules and carry out regular
monitoring.
Publicity
For an ES accompanying a planning
application the publicity by the local planning authority consists of the
following:
• a copy of the ES is put on Part
I of the Register of Planning Applications available for inspection by members
of the public;
• a site notice in the
prescribed form is displayed on or near the application site for not less than
21 days;
• an advertisement is put in a
newspaper circulating in the locality of the application site. Where the development involved is likely to
be controversial the planning authority may provide copies of the ES in local
public libraries or at local authority offices or other convenient
locations.
If an ES is submitted after the
Planning Application it is the applicant’s responsibility to organise publicity
by:
• a notice that should be put in
a newspaper circulating in the locality of the application site
• a site notice on the application site
containing the same information as the newspaper advertisement, in a position
where it is visible to members of the public without trespassing. The site notice
should remain in position for not less than seven days in the month immediately
preceding the submission of the ES. A
certificate that the site notice has been posted together with a copy of the
newspaper advertisement should be supplied to the local planning authority with
the ES.
Ø In
Indonesia, law of environment impact assessment arranged in several
legislation.
1. Undang-Undang
Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 tahun 2009- Environmental Protection and Management
2. Peraturan
Pemerintah No. 27 Tahun 1999- Environmental Impact Analysis
3. Keputusan
Presiden Nomor 10 Tahun 2000- the Environmental Impact Management Agency
4. Peraturan
Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup No.24 Tahun 2009- Environmental
Impact Analysis Document Assessment Guide
5. Peraturan
Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup No. 05 Tahun 2008- Working Procedures Audit
Commission of Environmental Impact Assessment
6. Peraturan
Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 8 Tahun 2006- Guidelines for Preparation
of Environmental Impact Assessment


Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar